Almost anyone can pin point moves/techniques, either in kata, kumite, drills, etc in which they deem useless but kept either for tradition, because "sifu says", or simply "just cuz". Whatever the case, it's pretty obvious that many feel that this is the case. Look at MMA - it's boiled down to a grappling art, some kickboxing and you're set! What happened to phoenix eye, tornado kicks, the cat stance...OR..even..the crane kick?
Wing Tsun touts being an efficient fighting system. Efficient as in how? That takes advantage of the shortest distance to reach its target? Efficient in not having to kick high? Efficient in being practical? Efficient in being one of the faster arts to learn/use?
But are there techniques in the system that is really redundant, or really not that practical, even though it may have practical implications? For all those "chunners" out there, take a moment to step away from the "WING CHUN IS THE BEST" perspective and examine what moves do we use too much, or not needed?
Is it tan sao? Is it bong sao?
I think we use bong sao way too much.
I also think we stick too much.
I don't think we need to stick at all nor do I think we need to use bong sao.
But to get to this level, we do NEED both?
What do you think?
Until then.
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
For those within the wing chun circles, there are two camps - one that is for weight training and another against weight training. Let's...
-
How can I NOT talk about this? My good friend and WT colleague has been keeping me in the loop on the Shawn Obasi wing chun sticky hands sa...
-
My comments to follow next posting. In the mean time, enjoy. What are your thoughts? Thanks to Gary K for sending this to me. Until then. **...
No comments:
Post a Comment